The gathering & what comes next
Citizens Gathering
Revisit the conversations. Understand the proposals. Find your next step.
Who decides what?
The leadership discussion explored a practical question: how can people take responsibility while decisions stay understandable and open to challenge?
Based on an automatic transcript. Discussion themes, not confirmed decisions.
Explore the Day 3 discussion
Who decides what?
The draft explored how shared direction, operational responsibility and oversight could fit together.
Try it in everyday life.
Questions about spending and oversight showed why people need practical examples alongside a diagram.
Make the next version clearer.
The closing discussion described integrating feedback and further deliberation before a formal vote.
Photos, transcript & original companion
The protected archive contains the Day 3 transcript, workshop photo notes and the earlier companion. The transcript and photo-derived interpretations remain unverified.
Open the protected archiveUse the archive password you were given.
Where are the other three days?
We have partial notes and supporting documents, but not a reviewed account of all four days. The exact calendar date of the Day 3 recording is also unconfirmed.
See the recap’s source coverageCitizen participation
The proposals
Understand what would change, why it matters and where you can take part.
Current proposal briefs are awaiting their original texts and links. Open proposals have been reported; we have not yet verified the details, voting dates or participation rules here.
What will each proposal explain?
The change
What is being proposed, compared with what happens now?
A practical example
What would this mean in an everyday situation?
Your next step
Where to ask, discuss or vote, with the confirmed dates and who can participate.
Earlier proposal background
These are earlier discussions and documents, not a list of current open ballots. Status notes were checked on 2 October 2026.
Leadership & governanceGathering discussion · current text missing
How do shared direction, day-to-day responsibility and oversight fit together?
The draft discussed on Day 3 explored giving people responsibility to do the work while keeping decisions understandable and open to challenge.
That summary comes from the unreviewed transcript. It is not the final proposal or an adopted authority structure.
Try an everyday decision: several small projects add up to a significant cost. Who approves the combined spending? Who can question it? What happens next?
The complete current proposal and its changes since the gathering are still needed before those questions can be answered.
Revisit the Day 3 recapThe Land Development PlanProposal 24 · marked Failed on 2 October
A proposal to bring land, building and ecological plans together as a binding reference for development.
The plan would shape what happens where, and how future changes are considered. The recorded vote did not pass; this document is background, not an open ballot.
A useful contribution: choose one area or paragraph. Name the change, clarification or evidence that would help you assess it.
Read the original Proposal 24Token supply & accommodationDIP 22 v2 · marked Failed on 2 October
Proposed changes to token supply and accommodation use, including long stays and whole-site bookings.
Read the proposal and linked model together. A spreadsheet assumption is not, by itself, a current booking term or an adopted token supply limit.
A useful contribution: ask for a comparison between the current and proposed rules for one stay you understand. Which assumptions produce the difference?
Read DIP 22 v2 and its linked modelMaking Our Votes CheckableDIP 25 · draft as checked 2 October
A draft asking the community to explore ways to make recorded votes easier to inspect.
Gustavo Segovia’s draft, published 30 September, describes improvements to Closer, a Snapshot trial, and a way to inspect an individual recorded vote. Selecting an official system would be a separate decision.
Its technical claims remain the author’s claims; Pulse has not independently verified them.
A useful contribution: name the evidence that would make a result understandable and checkable for you.
Read the DIP 25 draftThe source page’s comments require sign-in.
Prepare a useful contribution
Once you have a proposal in front of you, choose something that fits the time you have.
- 5 minutes · find your question
Read what would change. Note the one thing you still need to understand.
- 15 minutes · make it useful
Point to a specific section. Explain what you understand and ask for one example or amendment.
- An hour · test it in real life
Work through a practical example with someone who sees it differently. Turn the result into a clarification or suggested change.
A starting point for your comment
In [section], I understand the proposal would [change]. What I still need to understand is [question]. An example or amendment that would help is [suggestion].
Ready to support it? Explain which change you support and why. Add a specific offer of help if you have one.
Use the proposal’s stated discussion route. Pulse does not send comments or record votes. If a ballot is open, check who can vote and use its official voting link.
Helping write the next version?
- Decision: what are citizens being asked to approve?
- Purpose: which shared need does it serve, and why now?
- Practical work: who would do it, with what resources?
- Next dates: when can people comment, and when will progress be reviewed?
Show what changed in response to feedback. Only add a voting window once it is confirmed.
Suggested writing guide, not a new TDF process.
What proposal material do we have?
Jaggy reports that open proposals exist and will be shared. Their current texts, links, voting windows and participation rules are still needed here. The public governance index is not treated as a complete list.
The supplied State of the Nation presentation, DIP 22 material and linked model, and earlier public proposal pages show what was presented or proposed at a particular time.
They do not verify current finances, current rules or adoption. The supplied Leadership & Governance “Final” slide export contains only a cover page; the complete current proposal is missing.
The background proposal status labels were read on TDF’s public pages on 2 October 2026. They can change.
Coming with the published proposal
How well do you understand it?
A short quiz about what the proposal actually changes and how it works in practice.
Waiting for the proposal. The questions will be based on its published text.
How the quiz will work
- Start with three questions. Continue if you want to explore more.
- Get an explanation after each answer, with a link to the relevant source.
- Find the parts you want to revisit or discuss.
It is a way to learn at your own pace. Taking it is optional and does not determine whether you can vote.